Maternal mortality review in a major tertiary referral hospital in Liberia, 2018-2021.

Objectives: Anecdotal evidence showed increased maternal deaths at the major tertiary hospital over the past two years (2020-2021). We reviewed the maternal death audit data, identified the main causes of maternal death, and associated risk factors. Findings were shared with policymakers to help reduce maternal mortality. Study design: We conducted a secondary data review and descriptive analysis of maternal death at the tertiary hospital located in Monrovia. Method: The maternal death data were extracted from patient medical records, including death certificates and maternal audit records. The record of live births was obtained from the delivery register. Data were analyzed using Epi Info version 7.2 Maternal mortality ratio (MMR) was estimated, the leading direct and indirect causes of maternal death were identified, and the factors associated with maternal death were explored using logistic regression at a 5% level of significance. Results: There are a total of 233 maternal deaths and 14, 879 live births giving a maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of 1565 per 100,000 live births during the period under review. The median age of the mothers at death was 29 (14-45) years. About 40.3% (94/233) of cases died within <1 day of admission, referrals accounted for 59% (137/233) of the cases. Direct causes of death accounted for 66% (147/223). Hemorrhage [30.6% (45/147)], Eclampsia [(30/147) 20.6%] and Sepsis [(30/147) 20.6%] were the main direct causes of death while cardiovascular-related [18.4% (14/76)] and HIV/AIDS [16% (12/76)] were the leading indirect cause of death. Patients from referred other facilities were 7.9 times more likely to die as compared to non-referral (pOR:7.9, 95%CI: 5.9-10.6, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The maternal mortality ratio remained high. Referrals were done late. The Liberia Ministry of Health should equip more secondary-level health facilities and tertiary hospitals to handle maternal emergencies and sensitize the populace and healthcare workers on prompt identification and referral of obstetric emergencies. The MoH also needs to improve the blood transfusion services to help in the management of postpartum hemorrhage.

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among adults in Liberia, April-May 2021.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination is one of the most cost-effective public health interventions used to prevent diseases in susceptible populations. Despite the established efficacy of vaccines, there are many reasons people are hesitant about vaccination, and these reasons could be complex. This rapid survey estimated the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and potentially contributing factors in Montserrado and Nimba counties in Liberia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among adults living in Liberia. The relationship between vaccine non-acceptance and sociodemographic characteristics was examined using chi-square statistics. The variables with a p-value less than 0.2 at the bivariate analysis were modelled in a binary logistic regression at a 5% level of significance. The adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval are reported. RESULTS: There were 877 participants in the study. Majority were 25-34 years of age (30.4%, 272/877), females (54.05%, 474/877), and Christians (85.2%, 747/877). Most of the participants were aware of the COVID-19 vaccine (75%, 656/877), single (41.4%, 363/877), self-employed (37.51%, 329/877), and live-in rural communities (56.1%, 492/877). Vaccine hesitancy was (29.1%, 255/877; 95% CI:26.2-32.2). Vaccine hesitancy was greater among adults living in urban areas (41%) compared to persons living in rural communities (59%) (aOR; 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1) and respondents aged 45-54 years (aOR:0.5; 95% CI: 0.2-0.9; p = 0.043) were 50% less likely to be hesitant to COVID-19 vaccination compared to those more than 55 years. The most common source of information was the media (53%, 492/877) and the main reason for being hesitant was a need for more information about the vaccine and its safety (84%, 215/255). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of study participants were aware of the COVID-19 vaccines and their most common source of information was the media (television, radio). Vaccine hesitancy was moderate. This could pose a challenge to efforts to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the health authorities should provide more health education on the importance of vaccines and their safety to the populace.

The influence of first wave of COVID-19 outbreak on routine healthcare services, Liberia, August 2020: a mixed study approach.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic left countries to rapidly implement diverse and stringent public health measures without recourse to mitigate its effect on the sustenance of routine healthcare services. This study described routine health service disruption and restoration strategies at 6 months into the epidemic in Liberia. METHODS: Liberia, with 15 counties, has 839 health facilities, with one-third in Montserrado County. A cross-sectional study using a mixed approach - quantitative and qualitative research with concurrent triangulation was conducted using a structured guide for group discussions among key health workers at 42 secondary and most patronized health facilities in 14 counties and 7 Montserrado districts. Additionally, routine health data between January and June 2019 and 2020 were extracted from the source documents to the electronic checklist. We performed a descriptive analysis of quantitative data and plotted the line graph of the relative percentage change. Transcribed audio recording notes were synthesized using ATLAS ti for content analysis to identify the themes and subthemes in line with the study objectives and excerpts presented in the results. RESULTS: Liberia declared COVID-19 outbreak on March 16, 2020. From conducted interviews at 41 health facilities, 80% reported disruption in routine health services. From January to June 2020, scheduled routine immunization outreaches conducted decreased by 47%. Using a relative percentage change, outpatient attendance decreased by 32% in May, inpatient admission by 30% in April, malaria diagnosis and treatment by 40% in April, and routine antenatal obstetric care by 28% in April. The fear of contacting COVID-19 infection, redeployment of healthcare workers to COVID-19 response, restriction of movement due to lockdown, inadequate or lack of PPE for healthcare workers, lack of drugs and vaccine supplies for clients, and partial closure of routine healthcare services were common perceived reasons for disruptions. Massive community health education and strict compliance with COVID-19 nonpharmacological measures were some of the health facility recovery strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 outbreak in Liberia caused a disruption in routine healthcare services, and strategies to redirect the restoration of routine healthcare services were implemented. During epidemics or global health emergencies, countries should sustain routine health services and plan for them.

COVID-19 reinfection in Liberia: Implication for improving disease surveillance.

COVID-19 remains a serious disruption to human health, social, and economic existence. Reinfection with the virus intensifies fears and raises more questions among countries, with few documented reports. This study investigated cases of COVID-19 reinfection using patients' laboratory test results between March 2020 and July 2021 in Liberia. Data obtained from Liberia's Ministry of Health COVID-19 surveillance was analyzed in Excel 365 and ArcGIS Pro 2.8.2. Results showed that with a median interval of 200 days (Range: 99-415), 13 out of 5,459 cases were identified and characterized as reinfection in three counties during the country's third wave of the outbreak. Eighty-six percent of the COVID-19 reinfection cases occurred in Montserrado County within high clusters, which accounted for over 80% of the randomly distributed cases in Liberia. More cases of reinfection occurred among international travelers within populations with high community transmissions. This study suggests the need for continued public education and surveillance to encourage longer-term COVID-19 preventive practices even after recovery.